grammarly-icon

Grammarly

A writing assistant that catches mistakes, rewrites weak sentences, and can now draft content from scratch.

Tested: September, 2026

VERDICT

7.5
Conditional

Grammarly is still better at improving existing writing than replacing a dedicated content platform. Its advantage is that it works inside email, documents, browsers, and workplace apps without adding another step. But it is no longer just an editor. Grammarly can brainstorm and generate emails, summaries, articles, and marketing copy, while its newer Docs and AI agents take it well beyond grammar correction.

— AI Suggestions Verdict

● 8.0+ recommended

● 6.0–7.9 conditional

● under 6.0 skip

Overview

We’ve used Grammarly across emails, blog content, client reports, ad copy, and internal documents for over two years, on both the Free plan and Pro. For this review, we focused primarily on how it performs as a writing improvement tool, while also testing its newer content-generation features.

Grammarly works across most places people write. That includes its browser extensions, desktop apps, Google Docs, Microsoft Word, Slack, Gmail, and mobile devices. You rarely need to copy your text into a separate editor. Grammarly says it now works across more than one million apps and websites, although specific features are not available on every platform. That broad coverage remains its biggest advantage over standalone AI writing tools.

The Free plan handles spelling, grammar, punctuation, and basic tone detection. It also includes 100 generative AI prompts per month, making it useful for occasional drafting and rewriting rather than just proofreading.

Pro adds full-sentence rewrites, clarity suggestions, tone adjustments, plagiarism checking, AI text detection, and 2,000 standard generative AI prompts per month. It also includes team features such as style guides, brand tones, snippets, knowledge sharing, and usage analytics.

Tone detection remains one of the most useful everyday features. Grammarly flags writing that sounds uncertain, overly casual, overly formal, or less confident than intended. That is helpful for non-native English speakers, but it is equally useful for anyone writing client emails, reports, proposals, or public-facing content.

Grammarly can now create emails, summaries, blog drafts, articles, advertisements, social posts, and other content from a prompt. Grammarly Docs also includes agents for proofreading, paraphrasing, citations, plagiarism checking, AI detection, audience reactions, and evaluating written work.

Where Grammarly still reaches its limit is campaign execution and structured long-form production. It can write the individual pieces, but it does not provide the deeper SEO workflows, campaign planning, reusable marketing processes, or large-scale content operations found in platforms such as Jasper or Writesonic. Grammarly is capable of producing a first draft. It is simply more convincing as an editor than as a complete marketing platform.

It also overcorrects at times. Grammarly can remove wording that gives a piece personality and replace it with something technically cleaner but less distinctive. Writers with a strong voice will still need to reject suggestions instead of accepting every correction automatically. The newer voice profiles and rewriting controls help, but they do not remove the need for judgment.

“Grammarly still earns its place as an editor. The difference now is that it can also give you the first draft.”

Pros Cons
+ Works across browsers, desktop applications, documents, email, Slack, and mobile – Less capable than specialist platforms for SEO workflows and complete marketing campaigns
+ Tone detection catches writing that sounds uncertain or inappropriate for the audience – Can flatten personality by prioritizing clean, conventional phrasing
+ Full-sentence rewrites and clarity suggestions save considerable editing time – Pro costs $30 per month without an annual commitment
+ Free plan provides useful proofreading and limited content generation – AI detection is probabilistic and should not be treated as definitive proof

Who would we recommend it to?

  • Professionals who write regularly without access to a dedicated editor
  • Non-native English speakers who want real-time tone and grammar feedback
  • Teams that need consistent terminology, tone, and brand rules
  • Writers using other AI tools who need a final editing layer before publishing

Skip it if:

  • You need a complete SEO or multi-channel campaign-production platform
  • You write with a distinctive voice and do not want automated rewrites influencing it
  • You need advanced keyword research, content briefs, or marketing workflow features
  • The Free plan already covers all the proofreading you require

Score Card

Score Card

Overall7.5
Ease of Use8.5
Features7.0
Response Quality7.5
Response Speed8.0
Value for Money6.5

Pricing

Free$0, with 100 standard generative AI prompts per month
Pro monthly$30/member/month
Pro quarterly$60/member every three months
Pro annual$144/member/year, equivalent to $12/month
EnterpriseCustom pricing

Alternatives worth a look

69d5b27eb2bbb021d22595e7_copy_ai_1

Copy.ai

An AI writing and workflow platform for marketing and sales teams producing repeatable content at scale.

6.4

Read Review →

google-gemini-icon

Gemini

A capable AI writer with the best free tier in the game, especially if you already live in Google Docs.

8.2

Read Review →

Related Reading

Guide, Reviews

5 ChatGPT alternatives worth trying

1 min read

Collection, Reviews

AI tools for marketing teams

1 min read

Alternatives, Reviews

How we score AI writing tools

2 min read